Friday, October 8, 2010

Reality

With a simple pair of lens, the entire world can seem entirely different. What could once be seen as a foggy mist above mountains can instead be seen as a crispy clear sky in a distant landscape. Holding the pair of lens in my hands, I can actively choose whether or not I want a blurry world or a focused world--but why should this be a dichotomy? Why cannot I see the world as I see it, or perhaps as I wish to see it? Am I supposed to be aware that I have lens to see clearly with? What if I don't-- shall I just roam the world, blindly, or rather, blurriedly?

These lens pave a path for us to elude somewhere else, but at the same time we are handicapped to walk along this pavement since we are completely disoriented on what is real and what is not. Constantly, it is a struggle to decipher truth among deception. But, is this not assuming that deception is the reality? That we must question all that is unreal in order to distinguish what truly is real? What is reality?


In a generation when technology and the media have bombarded the imagination with a plethora of unreal images, fantastical lands, and mythological creatures, it has become possible to merge the unreal with the real. It seems, however, that the fatal mistake being made is the life lived in an illusion of what is unreal. We assign value to unreal things, we analyze actions that have not been made, we conclude judgments on the what-ifs. We create alternate universes among our own. But who is to say that we do, in fact, live in a single universe? Perhaps we occupy two or three simultaneously. Ever heard of deja vu?

In addition to the lengths of greatness occupied by a universe, there is the internal universe, our own reality that suggests itself to be uniquely formed. It is a reality best understood exponentially. First, there is the reality of a fly on a wall. Once the fly occupies space, it is connecting to the universe of whatever space, or mass, it is surrounding. Therefore, its occupied space multiplies by itself. Imagine the fly, on a leaf. Then, adding another power, some rain drops fall onto the leaf. Now, it is the rain, on a leaf, near the fly. Third power. With each increment of increasing power, it can be observed that the fly has encountered a greater reality-space than that with which it originated. Therefore, it can be said, that the fly is in its own world. And when it interferes with other worlds, its world becomes larger and larger.

The same can be said of humans. We have our own realities, we are in our own worlds--both as a mass, and then as individuals. Beyond the disciplines of an individual, there are his mental worlds. With every new interaction, the mental realm of a person enters a new imagination of possibilities. New fantasies, new realities. All are formed. And, with each merging of realities, a set of reality absorptions occur, so that one person is no longer wholly himself, but rather, a collection of others' remains, others' realities. For example, if I lived in my own bubble and never knew who President Obama was, I would never be able to imagine the realities and fantasies of America. I would be limited to just my own world's perceptions.

We create cultures as if they were worlds. Aside from the obvious--travelling--as being the only act to induce the clashing of cultures, it can be noted that cultures can be born in any setting. Within a room, a culture is created between roommates. In a class, between classmates. In a prison, among inmates. In the wilderness, among nature. With each consequent environment is a culture, and with each culture demands a reality.

Our realities are numerous, and we form realities with our environment as well as with our people. We create a culture within friendships, yet a different culture with relationships, and yet another culture with formal interactions. We pass the boundaries of one world, of one culture to the next, with a simple handshake. Or with a simple change of clothes.

But how do we determine a shared culture, a shared world, a shared reality? A single reality. A universal truth, something that can be accepted regardless of who we have interacted with, what we have been exposed to, or where we have been? Indeed, globalization has risen out of these questions and has ultimately molded the world into a single thread, where the spool acts as an axis as the thread spins around with singular ideas, uniform environments, and universal cultures repetitively.

Our realities have become so interconnected. To pull a chunk out of mine and consider it a collective sample of the whole would be a fallacy. And to consider it as a single, original piece of my own reality would be impossible, since I have developed many interactions and have interfered with too many a reality. But there still remain realities to be discovered. My exponential connection with different environments needs to increase. And with this, I end with a quote from a wise man:

When you are on land, you turn and only see what is around you.
Climb on the mountain to seek the truth, for at the top, you see what is unseen.

5 comments:

  1. I think it's not exactly the realities or universes we leave in - but our perception of reality.
    The perception is limited by cognitive functions, and because of that limits the way we percieve the world around us. Therefore our perception of reality may be different from someone elses perception.
    Of course the quesion remains: what a reality is. If we will assume, that a reality is equal to perception, than we have infinite numbers of it. But we can also assume that we have one, objective, absolute reality, but we're unable to tell what is this absolute reality 'cause our perception is limited and always remain fragmentary.
    Than we move to the question: what shapes our perception? We? No way. I mean, 'I' or 'you' is a very fluid concept and there's very little of 'me' in me, if there's any. 'I' am just unique combination of everything I've ever come accros in my life and though I may think I think by myself, independently from the world, the way I think is determined by my previous experience.
    And a culture is nothing more like an attempt to organize a common perception of reality - make us somehow similiar in the way we percieve the world around us.
    So basically though we are fully aware that our perception will never allow us to know the absolute reality, we can still try to expand our 'bubbles'.

    I hope what I'vew writenn is understandable, 'cause it's not very easy to think or write on this level of abstraction not in your mother tongue ;)

    And finally, as atoms are constantly in the move, coming off from our 'bodies' and other joining us, we're literally becoming things and people that surround us. I don't remeber right now how long it takes to exchange all atoms in human body, but it's quite interesting that after some time you're completely new organism - when I realized that few years ago, that was quite big discovery ;)

    Anyway - cool blog, makes me think while I read it :D

    ReplyDelete
  2. Amelia,

    I find it very encouraging that you found that piece you posted interesting. (Or did you write that? I wasn’t sure) Not to sound like the "old guy" (which I am but I’m also young at heart) but I often find that that generations X & Y have been duped by the alternative "created" world as a result of visual media & technology developed over the past 20 or so years. Their perception of the world is often based on the creations imagined by others and not on the reality of the universe itself. It’s come to a point that I am not sure that they understand our true world (or) universal reality as a result of what, artists and myself, in our world refer to as the “Mind Fuck”, which is in reference to the unreal created to look real and blend seamlessly with reality. The Mind Fuck is an illusion, a false reality. To me this is very apparent in the world today as I meet younger people who are caught up in their own little world and can’t relate to, or wish to relate to someone much older than themselves. I see it in their inability to have a conversation with sustenance or depth. Communications and interaction skills are in the toilet more often than not. However, more and more I am noticing many younger people who are able to see reality through the “filters’ we’ve created and that makes me feel as if there is hope that they will be able to right a wrong that my generation began and was foolish enough to think that it wouldn’t warp younger minds of the time.

    Anyway that is my two cents worth of useless input. Nice post.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Szymon, I find it exhilarating that the concept of perception was your instinctive response, yet it had not even occurred to me the least bit while I was writing. I agree with you about our perceptions, and I see what you are saying about having the question of "what is reality" remain.

    You are right--we are a product of socialization. Just as I mentioned before, there is no *one* part of me left that is completely and authentically me, since the realities have interlocked so deeply.

    For this statement, I also have a response.." we are fully aware that our perception will never allow us to know the absolute reality." This is exactly what I meant when I said "Am I supposed to be aware that I have lens to see clearly with? What if I don't-- shall I just roam the world, blindly, or rather, blurriedly?" This notion actually stems from a poem that I heard yesterday from one of the other intl students (Vahid)-- ask him for it. It talks about how a person knows he knows that he knows. Others may not know that they don't know. Etc etc. Different combinations. I will try to get the poem to you.

    As for the atoms.. that is VERY cool. I am so glad you shared that. Hope to chat about it sometime.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As Socrates once said: All I know, is that I know nothing.
    And if I know nothing, than how can I know what reality is? How can I even know that something like reality exists? And what does it mean to exist?
    Quite messed up, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes...and I have always loved that quote. :)

    ReplyDelete